INTERLUDE: Concerning the possible wages of war!

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2025

War of its several types: In Wednesday afternoon's report, with Thanksgiving rapidly approaching, we issued a tiny word of caution about the attractions of war.

We even quoted President Lincoln. "We must not be enemies," he once said. "We are not enemies, but friends."

Later, he "accepted" the onset of warand that's the word he himself used in his astonishing Second Inaugural Address. But concerning the brutal war whose necessity he accepted, he said that we in the North were responsible for what had created it tooand that we must work to bind up the nation's wounds, "with malice toward none."

 "We must not be enemies," he had even said. "We are not enemies, but friends!"

When we composed that award-winning post, we didn't know that the shooting had already occurred in D.C.the shooting which has taken one young woman's life.

Where possible, war is better avoided, we said. In this report in the New York Times, we start to learn about the possible wages of any resort to war, whether the war in question is actively made or is simply accepted:

National Guard Soldier Dies From Wounds in D.C. Shooting

One of the two National Guard troops shot in Washington died on Thursday, a day after officials said an Afghan man who was once part of an anti-Taliban force supported by the C.I.A. opened fire on the soldiers just a few blocks from the White House.

Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, succumbed to her injuries, President Trump told service members by video from his Mar-a-Lago resort and residence. “She was savagely attacked,” he said. “She’s dead.”

The other victim was identified as Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24. Both of them, members of the West Virginia National Guard, had been deployed to Washington as part of what Mr. Trump had described as a crackdown on crime in the capital.

And so on from there. By all accounts, someone drove across the country to commit this crime. His history is recorded here:

The suspect, who was in custody after being badly wounded during the attack, was identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal. The authorities said he had driven across the country from Washington State to carry out the attack. Overnight, F.B.I. agents searched an apartment complex in Bellingham, Wash., where the suspect had been living...

Mr. Lakanwal had entered the United States through Operation Allies Welcome, a Biden-era immigration program for Afghans fleeing the Taliban takeover. After he was identified as the suspect, the Trump administration vowed a sweeping re-examination of immigrants from 19 nations “of concern” including Afghanistan. The administration said it would re-examine “every Green Card” for immigrants from the countries upon which he had imposed a travel ban on in June, which also included Haiti and Venezuela.

Administration officials quickly criticized the Biden administration for allowing Mr. Lakanwal into the country in 2021 and said they were reviewing all asylum requests approved by the previous administration. Mr. Lakanwal, however, was granted asylum in April, after Mr. Trump’s return to office, according to three people with knowledge of the case who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Mr. Trump described the suspect as “nuts” and said there was “no vetting” by the Biden administration. Asked whether his administration had granted the asylum request, Mr. Trump deflected...

We include the apparent fact that the assailant was "vetted," and thereby granted asylum, in April of this year. We include that because it will inevitably become a messaging point in the pseudo-journalistic culture and propaganda war in which our struggling nation is now deeply engaged.

We humans! When war comes on, we split into tribes and then we start the name-calling. In Episode 2 of the PBS documentary, The American Revolution, Burns et al. described this process as it began to take form even way back then:

NARRATOR: The blood shed at Lexington and Concord had deepened the divisions among Americans from Georgia to New Hampshire.

"Loyalists," those who remained faithful to the Crown and hoped His Majesty's troops would soon restore law and order, dismissed those whose sympathies lay with the militiamen surrounding Boston as "rebels."

The "rebels" called themselves "Patriots"or "Whigs," after British champions of constitutionally guaranteed rightsand vilified their Loyalist neighbors as "Tories."

[...]

ALAN TAYLOR: I think the greatest misconception about the American Revolution is that it was something that unified Americans and that it was just a war of Americans against the British. It leaves out the reality that it was a civil war among Americans.

Loyalists, Patriots, Tories oh my! In Episodes 1 and 2, the Burns film goes on, at substantial length, about the violenceincluding the horrific sexual violencewhich took place when war drew on and we the people began to identify ourselves as the inevitable varieties of Us and Them.

On this morning's Fox & Friends, we saw Fox News Channel personnel wondering about the D.C. assailant's "radicalization" (or perhaps his "self-radicalization"). We saw no one raise the possibility of what is still called "mental illness" in other journalistic contexts. 

In a separate news report, the New York Times says this:

D.C. Shooting Suspect ‘Could Not Tolerate’ the Violence of His C.I.A.-Backed Unit in Afghanistan, a Childhood Friend Said

The Afghan refugee accused of shooting two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., fought in the late days of the U.S. war there as part of a “Zero Unit,” a paramilitary force that worked with the C.I.A., according to a person briefed on the investigation and an Afghan intelligence officer familiar with the matter. The units were known for their brutality and labeled “death squads” by human rights groups.

The suspect, identified by federal officials as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, grew up in a village in the eastern province of Khost. A childhood friend, who asked to be identified only as Muhammad because he feared Taliban reprisals, said that Mr. Lakanwal had suffered from mental health issues and was disturbed by the casualties his unit had caused.

“He would tell me and our friends that their military operations were very tough, their job was very difficult, and they were under a lot of pressure,” Muhammad said.

The suspect received asylum from the U.S. government in April, according to three people with knowledge of the case who were not authorized to speak publicly.

How accurate will this first account turn out to be? We can't tell you that. That said, Wednesday's killing seems to be part of the wages of a military war, but a culture / journalistic / propaganda war can be a source of great danger too.

Tomorrow, we'll try to finish stating our view about the wages of sin visited upon this struggling nation by braindead "cable news" TV shows like Gutfeld! and The Five.

As we noted in Wednesday morning's report, one recent profile has said that Greg Gutfeld is "servile" to President Trump. That strikes us as a basically accurate claim, but the New York Times (and other Blue American orgs) refuses to discuss that fairly obvious state of affairs.

Also unreported and undiscussed? The dumbness and coarseness of these programs, and most remarkably the apparent misogyny which seems to suffuse the astonishing Gutfeld! program.

Needless to say, Greg Gutfeld has every right to support the president who he once strongly opposed. It would help if he could state his views in ways which weren't overtly clownlike.

That said:

In our view, he actually is pseudo-journalistically servile to the sitting presidentand the New York Times has insisted on being deferential to the conduct of the Fox News Channel and to the behavior of Gutfeld himself.

We stand back today for the obvious reason. Also, let it be said that no one's assessments are perfect. Lincoln said that too!

No one's assessments are perfect! But President Lincoln had a strange ideaand he was the one who had  "accepted" the war in question. His radical moral conception was this:

Even in the face of vast disagreement, we must somehow strive to be friends!

Tomorrow: The worst profile of them all?


WEDNESDAY: President Lincoln proclaimed the day!

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2025

With that, Thanksgiving was born: Should the Democratic Party Six have issued that videotaped statement?

It triggered the predictable fury, first from President Trump himself. After that, it came from the fellow who prefers to call himself the Secretary of War, even though, as far as we know, it's still not entirely clear whether he is or he isn't.

As a general matter, we'd prefer that people say what they mean (present company excluded). We thought the videotape was a bit murky, and therefore perhaps a bit insinuative. The inevitable rage came next. But then again, tell us when that hasn't happened.

(There may be medical reasons...)

Tomorrow being Thanksgiving Day, we'll go with a sacred remembrance. It comes from Bret Stephens' new column for the New York Timesat least, from this first part of the column:

Thanksgiving Is an Opportunity for a National Reset

Though the Thanksgiving story is typically associated with the harvest feast of Pilgrims and Wampanoags in Plymouth, Mass., 404 years ago this fall, the national holiday Americans celebrate every fourth Thursday of November only began thanks to a presidential proclamation from Abraham Lincoln in 1863, the same year he delivered the Gettysburg Address.

That’s not just historical trivia. What we are meant to commemorate on Thanksgiving isn’t merely a mythologized version of our origins. It’s a celebration of American rebirth—and of the possibilities, personal and political, that go with it.

Stephens was already getting a bit highfalutin. We're not sure that we agree with everywhere he went after that.

We're not sure we agree with every word. We came here to post the history, and the history goes like this:

(continuing directly)
The idea for a national Thanksgiving holiday was not Lincoln’s own. It came from Sarah Josepha Hale, among the most influential Americans you’ve probably never heard of. “A partial list of Hale’s achievements on behalf of women,” wrote Melanie Kirkpatrick, Hale’s biographer, “includes leading the fight for property rights for married women, campaigning for women to be welcome as teachers in public schools, supporting medical education for women, creating the first day care center for small children and the first public playground, founding a society dedicated to increasing the wages of working women, and helping to found Vassar College, the first college for women.”

That wasn’t all Hale did. She wrote a best-selling antislavery novel. She spent decades as editor of Godey’s Lady’s Book, the most widely circulated magazine in the United States before the Civil War...And, beginning in the 1840s, she petitioned president after president to make Thanksgiving a national holiday.

Why was Hale obsessed with setting a national date for Thanksgiving? “There is a deep moral influence in these periodical seasons of rejoicing in which a whole community participates,” she wrote in 1835. But her purposes were also political: a national holiday, she argued, could help preserve the Union. Among her fiercest opponents, unsurprisingly, were Southerners who thought that designating a holiday was an issue for the states to decide.

In September 1863, following the Union’s victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, Hale again petitioned the president for an “annual Thanksgiving” to have “a National and fixed Union Festival.” In Lincoln and William Seward, his secretary of state, she found receptive ears. On Oct. 3, Lincoln proclaimed “a Day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens.”

President Lincoln proclaimed the day. Also this:

"We must not be enemies," he said at the end of his First Inaugural Address. "We are not enemies, but friends."

Soon thereafter, he chose to "accept" the war. Where possible, it's better avoided.

Tomorrow: Most likely, no fish tomorrow


SERVILE / DEFERENTIAL: Why did Gutfeld flip on Trump?

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2025

Gutfeld gets the word: Yes, he couldand yes, he actually did!

It's as we noted (again) yesterday. On at least three occasions during last year's campaign, Greg Gutfeld wondered if Hunter Biden was possibly having sex with first lady Jill Biden.

As we've noted, he didn't employ the circumspect locution "having sex." He turned instead to "banging" and "f*cking," with the F-bomb getting BLEEPed by the Fox News Channel's producers.

(The Gutfeld! program is taped.)

He did that at least three times. We say that because we observed and transcribed this garbage three separate times, and we weren't watching the program every night. This goes to the coarseness of this braindead "cable news" show, and to the willingness of Gutfeld's enablersKat Timpf included!to cheer this astonishing conduct on, or at least to voice no words of complaint.

We transcribed this garbage three separate times, offering links to the videotape saved by the Internet Archive. For one example, you can see THE DAILY HOWLER, 8/30/24

In that case, we were transcribing the gentleman 's conduct from the August 29 Gutfeld! show. Back in July, we had also transcribed this occurrence, after wiping the slime off our clothes:

GUTFELD (7/23/24): Speaking of Jill, where's she been, huh? And come to think of it, where's Hunter? Hmmmmm.

AUDIENCE: Chuckles, groans

I hope they're not [BLEEP]ing.

AUDIENCE: Roars

GUTFELD (feigning innocence): What? 

I mean

Just hoping! It's a good hope!

President Biden has scheduled a primetime

AUDIENCE: Extended laughter, applause 

GUTFELD: Didn't see that one coming, did ya?

TYRUS: This Pornhub moment is brought to you by Greg Gutfeld.

GUTFELD: Yes! 

The blowhard who was once a professional "wrestler" was urging the good fun along. The audience, familiar with this running theme, had understood the drift of this jibe all along.

These events speak to the coarseness of this show, though possibly not to the apparent misogyny in which the show seems to be drenched. However you score that matter, this conduct was taking place on a primetime "cable news" program, not on a "late-night comedy show"and we have to wipe the slime off our wardrobe every time we revisit it.

These presentations, and so many others, represent the startling change in the culture of the Fox News Channela transition from squeaky clean conservative "family values" to "conservative insult culture." 

Over here in Blue America, our major news orgs routinely defer to Fox. They've never made a serious attempt to report this major change in journalistic culturethis major change in the way the "news" is delivered to America's largest "cable news" audience.

The bloated blowhard urged Gutfeld on. Kat Timpf never complained about these astonishing presentations, or about the constant direct comparisons of liberal women to cattle, horses, cows, pigs, and dogs, to "livestock" and to whales.

On Friday, we'll show you the ridiculous way Gutfeld defends these insults. Today, we wanted to refresh you about the deference shown to the Fox News Channel by the apparently timorous beings in our own Blue American sphere.

On Friday, we'll instruct you concerning Gutfeld's absurd "hierarchy of smears!" For today, with Thanksgiving looming, we wanted to direct you to that one unusual profile of Gutfeld and the Gutfeld! show. 

We refer to this guest opinion piece written by John A. Daly (BernadrdGoldberg.com). It appeared at Mediaite in late August of this very year:

Mediaite: August 26, 2025
Opinion
How Greg Gutfeld Went From Fox’s Most Irreverent Host to Its Most Servile

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld is on top of the world right now, at least professionally. He co-hosts The Five, his network’s top-rated show that pulls in more than four million viewers every weeknight. Roughly three million people watch his late-evening show, Gutfeld!, earning him the moniker of “The King of Late Night” (which is also the title of his bestselling book). Earlier this month, his guest appearance on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, drew the program’s biggest ratings of the year.

Indeed, Gutfeld’s come a long way since his hosting duties on Red Eye, Fox’s satirical, take-no-prisoners 3 a.m. program that debuted in 2007...

That's the way the profile began. Even Daly repeated the Fox News Channel branding claim according to which Gutfeld had become "The King of Late Night” (which was also the title of his bestselling book), in spite of the fact that he doesn't host a "late night' TV program.

(Please. Gutfeld! airs at 9 p.m. in the Central time zone, at 7 p.m. on the coast.)

Even Daly took the bait and repeated that branding claim. But as you can see from reading his piecethere is no paywall to block you—he took a very different approach to the Fox News Channel host.

In his piece, Daly describes an unusual part of the history of the Gutfeld! show. He reports that Greg Gutfeld was aggressively anti-Trump back in 2015 and 2016, when the current president entered the political wars. 

As you can see in Daly's profile, Gutfeld was anti-Trump. But at some point, the fellow flipped, Daly reports. According to Daly, Gutfeld became a "servile" admirer of President Trump, as anyone who watches the Gutfeld! show can see on a nightly basis.

So it goes as Daly describes the striking move from the Fox News Channel's "most irreverent" host to its "most servile." That said, Daly doesn't try to explain the way this flip took place.

In fairness, anyone can change his assessment of some political figure. But Gutfeld's flip has been extremeand then too, there's that one suggestive passage from that earlier New York Times profile.

The lengthy profile to which we refer appeared in July 2023. Subscribers to the New York Times can click through and read the whole thing:

The New York Times: July 2, 2023
How Fox News (Yes, Fox News) Managed to Beat ‘The Tonight Show’
Greg Gutfeld has installed his brand of insult conservatism as the institutional voice for the next generation of Fox News viewer. And it’s catching on.

In that profile, the Times (accurately) noted the way the Gutfeld! show was building a very large viewership. Along the way, as we've mentioned before, the profile may have offered a hint as to the genesis of Greg Gutfeld's road to serfdom.

Below, you see the passage in question. As Candidate Trump seizes control of the GOP, the CEO of the FNC calls GG in for a chat. At this point, Gutfeld was still hosting a 10 p.m. weekend show:

Around this period, [Gutfeld] often did something that feels disorienting to rewatch, given the host’s present disdain for those who moralize about Mr. Trump: He moralized about Mr. Trump.

“I’ve heard people defend him about making fun of a disability, making fun of John McCain, making fun of women,” he said on “The Five” in December 2015, accusing a Fox colleague of “Trumpsplaining” away his behavior. “No one will ever stop defending the crass stuff he says.”

Before the election, Suzanne Scott, now the chief executive of Fox News Media, hosted Mr. Gutfeld in her office.

Mr. Trump had no chance anyway, he told her.

“She was like, ‘Greg, you should maybe prepare,’” he remembered, “‘for what happens if he wins.’”

It's hard to miss what that anecdote seems to suggest. When it became clear that Candidate Trump might even end up in the White House, the CEO summoned her irreverent host to her office and possibly gave him the word.

For the record, tens of millions of people do support President Trump; Gutfeld is hardly alone. That said, it would be hard to do so in a more servile way than is seen on today's Gutfeld! show.

Today, Greg Gutfeld a genuine, full-blown nutcase on the topic of the president's unmistakable greatness. Way back when, as Daly notes, he held a quite different view. 

Did this remarkable flip emerge as a career management play? We have no way of knowing.

That said, the Fox News Channel would of course be supporting President Trump. Did a certain Donald Trump critic decide to follow along?

Friday: Prepare to emit mordant chuckles (plus groans): "The hierarchy of smears!"


TUESDAY: Should the Democratic Party Six...

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2025

...have issued that now-famous taped statement?  Should the Democratic Party Six have issued that now-famous statement?

The statement has triggered the usual fury. This has been a busy time, but we hope to address that important question tomorrow afternoon, on our struggling nation's Day of Enormous Thanks Eve.

We must not be enemies, a president once famously said.


SERVILE / DEFERENTIAL: When we say the Gutfeld! show is coarse...

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2025

...this is what we mean: Watching the Gutfeld! show is a constant exercise is a type of fascination.

Having said that, we want to be frank. We're speaking of Conrad's famous phrase from The Heart of Darkness:

"The fascination of the abomination." 

We're in the grip of that type of fascination. Admitting a bit of prejudgment, we'll try to be fair in what follows.

For today, let's start with a quick look at the remarkable coarseness which defines this extremely peculiar "cable news" TV program. Also, let's get clear on what we mean when we call this a propaganda messaging programa propaganda program which delivers its corporate messaging under cover of comedy stylings.

Last night, the program's host started in the usual waywith 2-3 minutes of jokes. 

After that, he delivered his opening "issue monologue." But first, he delivered the following quips, some of which you may not "get" if you aren't a regular viewer of this extremely coarse messaging program.

Here's how the program started:

GUTFELD (11/24/25): So, Thanksgiving is Thursday. And we have the inside word on what everyone's favorite politicians and celebrities are giving thanks for on this holiday

Hunter Biden is grateful for Black Friday savings on hookers.

AUDIENCE: [Laughter]

GUTFELD: Jill Biden is grateful for Febreze.

AUDIENCE: [Laughter]

GUTFELD: Hillary Clinton is grateful for strong, reliable rope.

[PHOTO of a noose]

AUDIENCE: [Laughter]

GUTFELD: AnnnnndKim Kardashian is grateful for dark meat. [Chuckles]

AUDIENCE: [Laughter]

GUTFELD: She loves a good drumstick.

[Pretending to apologize] I don't find the humor in that.

[...]

GUTFELD: Anyway, scientists at the Department of Energy have determined the perfect household temperatureand it's 68 degrees. 

It's also the perfect temperature to keep meat from decomposing.

[PHOTO of President Biden]

AUDIENCE: [Laughter]

So the ghoulish fellow went. At 10:02 p.m., after a joke about Dolly Parton's enormous breasts, he thrilled the studio audience with this:

GUTFELD: A fashion designer claims he's using the wool of gay sheep at a New York fashion show. 

How did he know they were gay? Well, their dicks tasted like [BLEEP].

AUDIENCE: [Groans, laughter, applause]

GUTFELD (modestly): Thank you.

At 10:03, he closed with a joke aboutoh, never mind. But if you want to see last night's three minutes of jokes, you can do so by clicking here.

Now for the rest of the story:

The Fox News Channel once observed the prevailing conservative cultural norm known as "family values." With the addition of such stars as Gutfeld, whose style was developed in the dead hours of night, the channel has adopted a remarkably different tonea tone which is often remarkably coarse.

Some people find this change refreshing. Even for those who do, it's a major change in the way the nation's news gets delivered on primetime "cable news" shows. Newspapers like the New York Times should be reporting this remarkable shift in the nation's journalistic landscape.

Regarding last night's jokes, let's explain the point of the jokes for people who may be new to this very unusual program:

For starters, you'll note that Gutfeld clings to old Democratic Party targets.

He continues to talk about the Bidens. He continues to talk about Hillary Clinton. That's where his sallies are aimed. 

In this respect, he's much like the sitting president to whom he's been said to be servile. President Trump still focuses on Biden and them. So does the Fox News Channel's Gutfeld.

Regarding last night's jokes, let's offer these quick explications:

As the Gutfeld! audience knew, Jill Biden was said to be grateful for Febreze because of the way her husband is said to be constantly soiling himself, along with his clothing and any nearby furniture. 

Dating back to President Biden's time in the White House, this has long been a treasured theme on this remarkable "cable news" show.

The joke about Hillary Clinton and the rope is a nod to the constant theme according to which Hillary Clinton murders her opponents. Three decades after Jerry Falwell traipsed around peddling the Clinton Chronicles tape, this remains a constant theme on this nut-ball's "cable news" program.

The joke about Kim Kardashian and the dark meat represents the constant allure of slippery racial insinuation. (Gay-baiting and trans-baiting are also quote common on this braindead TV show.)

The joke about 68 degrees and President Biden is the latest example of this ghoulish fellow's creepy death culthis love of imagery in which President Biden is finally known to be dead. References to President Biden's hearse are remarkably common.

Regarding the taste of the d*cks of gay sheep, we don't know what word this idiot's producers chose to BLEEP. 

In part for that reason, we ourselves don't understand that joke at all. That said, Gutfeld's studio audience plainly loved the joke, as did several panelists. This is not your grandfather's Fox News Channel. That channel disappeared long ago.

Hillary Clinton murders people. We can't wait to see Joe Biden dead

Joe Bidne is constantly pooping and soiling himself. Barack Obama is secretly gay. His wife is a secret man.

This is the garbage that spills forth the Fox News Channel's CEO pries the lid off the can at 10 p.m. Eastern each evening. A panel of flyweights has been assembled to cheer this nut-ball on.

Some people find this palette refreshing. We'll say this:

To each his own.

People are free to indulge their own taste. That said, Greg Gutfeld has become a major "cable news" star by offering Fox News Channel viewers this highly repetitive fare. Let's go ahead and say it again:

This is a major fact about the changing face of American journalistic culturea fact which should have been reported and discussed, long ago, by major Blue American news orgs.

Instead, those orgs avert their gaze from this nightly behavior. It seems to us that our major Blue American orgs simply don't want to tangle with Fox. Instead, they defer to the powerful Murdoch org and to the braindead garbage it peddles.

We're speaking here of this program's coarseness. As we do, we're skipping past the various instances. performed last year, in which Gutfeld offered wonderful quips on this entertaining theme:

Now that President Biden is virtually dead, has Hunter Biden started "banging" or [BLEEP]ing first lady Jill Biden yet?

During the election campaign, that was also part of the fun, and along with that the misogyny flowed. Night after night after night after night, the five women of The View have been compared to cows, to pigs, to whales, to dogs, to horses, to cattle, or more generically to "livestock."

Joy Behar is 83 years old. Nany Pelosi is 85. Gutfeld has pounded away at them for years, insisting that Behar is much too fat and that Pelosi has had too many facelifts.

Also, that they aren't sufficiently attractive to satisfy this gnome's demands. This has long been standard fare on this garbage can program.

Within the last week, Blue America's journalists reacted strongly to the incident where President Trump referred to one colleague as "Piggy." There's no obvious reason why they shouldn't have.

That said, over the course of the past few years, this sort of "conservative insult comedy" has been constant on the Gutfeld! show. Blue America's major pundits have agreed to defer to this nightly behaviorand in several profiles of Gutfeld! in the past year, some pundits even tried to wish this behavior away.

(For the record, the comparison of The View's women to cows / pigs / dogs has seemed to disappear of late. Has this disordered little mutt been fleeing outside criticism?)

We can't answer that sensible question, but this has all been part of the shape of this ugly, astounding "news" program. The various posers who sit on Gutfeld's panels cheer his inanity on.

In last Friday's report, we posted links to five profiles of Gutfeld or the Gutfeld! show which have appeared this year. By our count, at least three of those profiles actively worked to misdescribe the ugliness and the apparent misogyny which form such an obvious part of this braindead "cable news" show.

One of those profiles was different. In late August, John A. Daly (BernardGoldbeg.com) published a guest piece at Mediaite which took a whole different approach. You can click for it here:

Mediaite: August 26, 2025
Opinion
How Greg Gutfeld Went From Fox’s Most Irreverent Host to Its Most Servile

Daly critiqued and criticized Gutfeld as President Trump's most servile cheerleader. He also took us back to the days when this very same Greg Gutfeld was aggressively anti-Trump.

As he spews his venom around, Gutfeld serves as a major fan boy for President Trump. The four stooges who surround him on the set each night support him in this act of corporate messaging.

That said, how did this woman-hating attack-dog ever end up in the pro-MAGA camp?

An earlier profile may give us an answer to that. Tomorrow, we'll review John Daly's profile, and we'll look at an earlier hint which may explain how Greg Gutfeld's winding road ended up taking him there. 

Tomorrow: Gutfeld gets the word


BREAKING: We'll be posting a little bit later than usual!

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2025

Gutfeld! reviews marches on: Due to a short stop at the medical mission, we'll be posting a little bit later than usual today.

At that point, we'll be marching forward with our review of the Gutfeld! program. We plan to move on from this current project after this Friday's post.